"Columbia Univeristy senior Emma Sulkowicz plans on carrying an extra-long, twin-size to every class, every day until the man she says raped her moves off campus. Sulkowicz is one of three women who made complaints to Columbia against the same fellow senior, who was found "not responsible" in all three cases."
Beyond ‘No Means No’ by Jessica Valenti for The Guardian
This isn’t rape culture. This is some dumb broad who had regrettable drunk sex, ran to the campus officials and cops and is now butt hurt that the guy she accused isn’t expelled. So what does she do? She does what every dumb broad does when she doesn’t get her way, she throws a tantrum and causes a scene. This time though it’s passed off as “performance art” when it’s really organized harassment of the guy who was found innocent by the authorities. People like to complain about bullying of all sort, but no one ever calls out feminists and women for it. This woman is carrying on an organized campaign to fuck with this guy. So are the girls who print and post “rapist lists” (guys who are supposedly rapists but have never been convicted, charged or even investigated because no one has reported them). That shit is straight up libel and harassment of the highest fucking order. The fact people applaud her and join her just makes me weep for humanity.
Time for class everyone, let’s get a breakdown 101 of how rape apologists and victim blamers operate using this example:
-Start by using disgusting terminology to demonize and degrade the victim of assault by alluding to their specific type of suffering.
-Reporting a crime becomes “bitching.” Challenging a campus - already rife with criminal violations - through non violent, peaceful demonstration becomes “throwing a tantrum.” Violent rape and assault becomes “a regretted night.”
-Reiterate the violent myth that women want to be raped, and that facing public scrutiny and further harassment by being vocal about the incident is actually, again, abuse that this person seeks due to a desire for “more attention.”
-Ignore how law enforcement and organized systems, such as universities, often collude in a myriad of ways to dissuade victims from reporting in the first place.
-Refuse to mention subsequent victims stepping forward publicly to report that they have been assaulted by the same person.
-Pretend that reading the finer details of court proceedings and incident reports is superfluous and unnecessary wrt the content of bullet two.
-Subscribe to the very outlets that report on this issue so one can lie in wait like a snake to word vomit a hardly intelligible “argument,” that essentially gives the overall impression of ones relatable characteristics and plights of a serial rapist.
-Finish up with a lack of sourced material and an abundance of a bullshit opinion, based on the struggles of oppressed people struggling to protect one another, who will otherwise be referred to as whiners/liars/libelous criminals.
-Insert ones own cranium into ones own anus, like the truly edgy guy you are.
How about this, instead of counting “unreported” rapes in bullshit statistics (if you don’t report it then it never happened to law enforcement officials) any woman who feels she was raped on campus should report it. Maybe there isn’t enough evidence this time, but enough reports like that themselves turn into something as good as evidence. These women coming out after the fact fall into two categories “victims” and attention seekers. Sadly they’re mostly the latter. So here it is:
- If you think you were raped then report it.
- If the guy gets cleared then move on with your life and stop letting him control you
- If he finally is indicted then come forward and offer your testimony to help prosecutors show a pattern of behavior
- Actual rapist goes to jail.
Until then, stop treating every man as if he’s a future rapist just waiting to rape some girl who got herself too drunk at a party. That’s offensive to straight men who don’t rape and doubly offensive to gay men as well.
Feminazi’s on college campuses have made it too easy for some vengeful woman who regretted having sex with someone below her social strata to ruin his life. You got drunk, you had sex, move on.
Why aren’t campuses or police departments taking seriously claims of female on male rape? It happens far more than you think. Some guys is too drunk, she drags him home and he ends up having sex with someone he never wanted to. By my definition that’s rape but it’s all those feminists fighting for
equality superiority that write it off with he was asking for it, he wouldn’t have gotten hard if he didn’t want it, he wouldn’t have orgasmed if he didn’t want it. These are all involuntary reflexes that can be triggered by physical action against one’s own will.
Numerous rape female rape victims have reported ecoming physically aroused and orgasming simply due to the physcial activity of sex. They didn’t want to enjoy it but on a base physical level they did and that creates massive shame.
So shut the fuck up about this loony bitch and her mattress. She want’s attention and not all of it will be pretty. Not everyone is some liberal sycophant hoping to score points with feminists.
Some of us can just see what things really are.
Let’s continue everyone, and watch the sad dance of the angry and scared pseudo-intellectual, wannabe-expert on sexual assault, statistics AND sociology. Pretty ambitious loser we got here, so let’s continue to use him as an example:
What is a “victim” in scare quotes, other than what he’s calling an attention seeker? In truth, he doesn’t think of or care about any victims of assault or rape, including men, because he doesn’t even include a space for actual victims to exist.
If he actually gave a fuck, he wouldn’t continually show his own ass using derogatory and misogynistic language that only serves to continue to associate him with the male rapists he insists are in smaller supply than the “bullshit” statistics he insists are lying.
What is his professional background that qualifies him to tell female rape victims what to do or not do based on their own safety concerns? None, whatsoever, but that’s typical rape apologism we’re familiar with. If a victim despite reatraumatization receives no justice, he considers it something to shrug off and “move on” from.
What are his sources to back up any of his posited points? If qualified statistics on unreported rape are supposedly bullshit, then unqualified postulating about the proper methodologies for dealing with PTSD, physical trauma, as well as co-morbid disorders must be equally, if not more so, utter and complete bullshit.
Where, from the context of the post, does he become inclined to stipulate that feminists, amongst other social justice advocates, don’t consider victims of sexual assault of all genders? Well, nowhere, and that one’s pretty easy, because though I’m not statistician, imo the real source is probably about 50% insecurity and 50% pig-headedness.
Not that it bears warrant for even repeating, but I think we all know why “feminazi” is a really great way to take whatever shadow of credibility - if any was ever remotely present (it wasn’t) - prior to shitting the proverbial bed, null and void.
In addition to this self-proclaimed expert on law and law enforcement, he easily presents himself as woefully ignorant about laws surrounding and relating to intoxication and sexual assault, and as to how they vary state by state.
It’s almost cute how he thinks he’s educating us about how physical arousal in any person, of any gender or sex, is not consent. Almost. Because then he goes on being a grotesque specimen of a failed human being by intentionally failing to understand that arousal from stimulation is not the same as deriving enjoyment on a “base physical level.” This goes for any and all victims of assault.
Note the final usage of ableism to discredit her mental health and stability as well as claiming that caring is limited to only those wanting to “score feminist points” clearly alludes to his real problem here; that a movement organizing against assault that KNOWS the legal process often falls woefully behind, and chooses to act in spite of that, is a threat to the fact that he may not be in any position to claim a moral solipsism to which he’s felt largely entitled to his whole life.
On top of this whole pathetic hot mess, this dude follows this blog in a way not all unlike the irl creepy, misogynistic behavior of harassment that plagues public streets and venues in our societies. It is another reason as to why we refrain from posting your more personal messages stories and submissions here.
All in all, there really couldn’t be a better example of a misogynist who wants to stay a misogynist, but wishes he’d be told he’s valiant and right for staunchly maintaing his internalized hatred and self esteem issues.